October 11, 2006
So.
Here is a thing from YouTube, showing Judith Supine at work on the streets of New York.
In this instance Supine uses found texts to produce something new; the art process consists of a reconstitution of the found texts which is then processed digitally and then put straight back on the streets. It is a kind of re-arrangement of the environment to make you sit up and notice. And the use of commercial art in this way is ironic; cutting up the magazines, transforming the beautiful models into something ghoulish, staring out from the walls at passers by.
Here is some stuff from MOO. If you are a member of Flickr then YOU TOO can get cards made with your own images. I used a big mix of images to see what I would like best and then plan to order some more of the ones I really like.
Today’s post has been about how we can use and re-use texts to make new ones with new meanings. I have become very interested in the idea of PROVENANCE; the way texts collect additional meanings from the journeys they have made and the associations they have picked up from being in other contexts.
More from Judith:
June 2, 2006
You have heard of web 2.0.
Now, is the debut of the next big thing…
So here is a film, of Jesus 2.0 in the making and of its journey to, and installation onto, the streets.
The on street installation was just one part of the production process for in the link , we see not just the art artefacts, but also another piece of art - a video, with music and words.This video production gives additional meanings to the artefact; the video shows the art as a whole process, not just as being the final product. But further meanings surround the artefact, via the video. The video looks low budget and that gives the whole artistic process and product a kind of ‘rough around the edges’ feel to it. It gives it the feel of urban guerilla; of being made quickly in a confined space on meagre resources. All these things ADD to the meaning - the semiotic process. The fact it is on a web site; a web site that is not advertised officially but whose link is passed around the web, blog to blog. (I got it from TT who got it from Gammablog’s Flickr stream). Makes it all feel covert, exciting.
Much of the graffitti I photographed in NYC last month was pasted in and around Wooster Street. (Like this one:)
Turns out there is a Wooster Street Collective - and they also are experimenting with the modality of their work. Moving it to a range of media inorder to give it a wider audience. This blog gives an off street showcase for the pieces; it also reports on a book publication, and even an exhibition tour.
Is ’street art’ moving off the street? Is it now best known as ‘urban communication?’ And what does that mean?
is that why this site refers to ‘urban communication?’
And is this my new research area?
Funky business.
April 3, 2006
I am going to write something for a journal about representations of domesticity and the everyday on Flickr - which will feed into a paper I hope to present at a conference next January.
The abstract I sent off is this:
Prior to the invention of digital cameras, amateur photographs depicting aspects of domestic life were always material artefacts traditionally reserved for restricted viewing within the confines of the home. Photographs representing ‘family life’ have been the most common type shown within the home, reflecting, highlighting, even shaping aspects of the lives from which they are drawn – often accumulating narratives of family identity within that domain (Hirsch, 2002; Kuhn, 1995).
Drawing on a study of a photosharing website (Flickr.com), this paper explores ways in which domestic life is represented and talked about through online screen based images, where traditional boundaries between the public and private spheres are being extended, challenged or eroded. The paper reflects on the presentation and subject of the images; the narratives around them, and at how new digital tools and practices are impacting on the ways in which we see and represent ourselves within the domestic setting. Third space theory (Soja, 1996) is invoked to explore aspects of the global/local practices on Flickr, and to reflect on the processes of online social learning, with particular reference to the domestic.
So that is what I want to present about for the conference but I want to write a fuller paper for a journal. Here are a few examples of the kind of thing I am interested in:
- Every day aspects of life dignified, or made arty here. This is a kind of home as museum approach. Cultural studies stuff. This is in fact from ‘The New Domesticity group’ which describes itself like this:
Domestic life has changed drastically in the past 50 years. What does your domestic life look like? Sewing, cooking, houseplants, crafts, aprons, I’d love to see photos of anything that fits into your domestic life. My hope is
to showcase a younger generation\’s style and shape of domesticity.
- Another example of life as art is here and I notice that this photo is also in the set up shots/not quite a still life pool as well as the ‘everyday life pool’. I love this kind of example which asks people to share in their life, with a descriptions saying, ‘this is not about the photography but the content (apple pie).
- In the kitchen allows people to show off their cooking a bit or again there is a kind of museum/cultural studies approach. And I love this which is also in the ‘experimental’ group. By looking at the cross sections of groups that people put their photos in, you get an idea of the intention behind the photo. Similarly the group: ‘Domesticity: artful photos from around the house’ concentrates on things looking good. Very self conscious presentations of identity in the images like this washing up one. or the pegs.
- And here is a really interesting glimpse into habitual ways of living and cooking (with a bowl resting on a cheese grater.) Note the sets this photo is in - it is in one to do wth ‘family’ and one to do with travel. Here the associations run through strongly with family, holiday and food. I feel like this one is a bit less like a ‘good house keepings’ photo.
- I love this one which gives me ideas of what to get for dinner. Here is a delicious meal. A million genre of cookbook and magazine can be seen here.
- An insight into life alone from the apartment life group. There’s a whole load of stuff to do with food issues again resonating here.
- Hapakorean has been a contact of mine for a long ,long time and I saw the toddler in this photo from ultrasound shots even before he was born. HK documents the lives of her kids in detail and has just started enjoying vimeo. Here she has a movie of her son feeding his grandma ‘numnums.’ Just an episode of a few minutes showing the great American dream; the ideal family here with beautiful children and home. In addition I have traced through the story of how HK met her sister for the first time through Myspace. A lot revealed in these lives here through Flickr and HK has quite a following. Completely fascinating all this stuff as life moves seemlessly through the wrinkled binaries of life online and offline. (HK went to a Flickr meet a short while ago. )
- Of course festivals like Christmas, weddings and Mother’s day are all excellent areas for me to look at in terms of representations of the domestic. So far a quick glimpse shws me they display things carefully. Apart from this exceptional photo of a ‘divorced grandparents’ domestic’.
- And so is ‘what’s in my cupboard?‘ , ‘what’s in your bag?’ , ‘inside your drawers’, ‘deskspace‘, fridge and so on.
- I want of course to also look at representations of family other than the type HK has shown - which are really quite traditional despite the new medium. I find this a brave image - showing a choild looking pretty uncared for - but I am sure this is not so, it is just the presentation has not been ‘cleaned up.’
- I love the groups which try to emulate particular photographers. So this photo of a Dad and uncle (twin brothers) is in the Diane Arbus group. So the display is mediated through what is known about a photographer.
- This one is presented like a social history display in a museum again, using artefcats of identity to represent something of character and time.
- And also I want to look at the comments people are making, since this is often at least as revealing as the photo and more stuff is shown of the domestic through the comments quite often.
Lots of data huh? Whoever said that blogs were a waste of time?? I am finding a structure for this paper I think. And some questions.
I am wondering as I am looking at these photos whether the images themselves break down any boundaries? Are they pretty stereotypical of other photos we see in magazines? Family photos? Are we presenting family and domestic life in new ways? Or are the photos the same as they ever were? (Just more of them?) … while the nature of Flickr is allowing new conversations and new insights into our lives? Hmm those are things I will think about. Maybe it is the community and the talk around the photos that are bringing in the new?
Shall I submit this article to Visual Communication or somewhere else?
